of that land, it would be necessary
the reversal of that
obtain virtually judgement.
After a careful perusal of the judgment, and considering all the fact of the
race,
especially the difficulty of determining positively the point from which the boundaries of the different lot should start, I am of opinion,
allowing for the fresh
evidence which Mr Stephens says he can produce, that it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to obtain a judgement really be the reversal
which would,
of that of the 6th March, 1885, and to prove that the owners of Marine Lot 185 are in possession of more
than they
are entitled to
land
I have already fully reported the question of compensation, and
Annexure to Circular 2,
Report by the Acting Attorney General.
332
Mr Stephens, in his letter of the 12th December 1885 claims from the Government a sum of $10,000 as Compensation for being deprived of a strip of land along the Eastern Boundary of Marine Lot No 184
Covering
an area
of 339 square feet.
His claim, he states, is made up "the actual value of the land which
was conveyed
to him by the
Crown Lease, and to this he adds :
1. The cost of defecting his title
with the express assent and
assistance of the Crown Officers
2. The expenses incurred in preparing
plans, making contracts, and
levelling ground, and
construction on the ground.
3. The
concluded that under the circumstances
of the case Mr. Stephens is not entitled
to any compensation.
Edw. J. Ackroyd,
Attorney General.
22th July 1887.
to
of that land, it would be necessary
the reversal of that
obtain virtually judgement.
After a careful perusal of the judgment, and considering all the fact of the
race,
expecially the difficulty of determining positively the pointe from which the bow, daries of the different lot should start, I am of opinion,
allowing for the fresh
elerr
evidence which Mr Stepheus says he con produce, that it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to obtain a judquent really be the reversal
which would,
of that of the 6. March, 1885, and to prove that the owners of allarine fot 185 are in possession of more
thave they
are et
entitled to
land
I have already fully reported the question of compensation, and
Annexure to Circlosure 2,
•Report by the Acting Attorney several.
332
ler Stepheus, in his letter of the 12th December 1885 claims from the Lovernment a su of $10,000 a Compensation for being deprived of a strip of land along the Eastern Boundary of alterine fot no 184
Covering
an arba
of 339 square foot.
His claim, he states, is made up "the actual value of the land which
to him by the
of the he
seup
wvde
conveyed
Crown Lease, and to this he adds :
1 . ° The cost of defecting his titte
with the express assent and a
of the Crown Officers
assistance
2. The expences incurred in preparing
plans, making contracts, to for
the
omid leaved, of
gromid
down to cover the entire
072
Construction
ጊ
on the
godmon
ground.
3. The
concluded that under the circumstance
case Mr.
Stephens is not entitled
of the
to any
any compensation sof
Edw.
J. Ackroyd,
A17 Atty Gaveral
aud
of the
expenses of altering plano
buildings
to suit the smaller
are-a
➡➡2th July 1887.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.